Research

We aim to put as much information as possible about health in the public domain in a way that is useful, understandable and credible to enable policy-makers and decision-makers to craft the best policies with the highest benefit for their own context.

Through quantitative analysis and development of techniques to glean information from multiple and varied sources we add value by focusing on five areas:  Health Outcomes; Health Services; Resource Inputs; Decision Analytics; and Evaluations.

Health Outcomes: We study what makes people sick, what they die from and which risk factors contribute to these outcomes. Ongoing research projects is the:

  • estimation of child mortality levels for each country since 1970 forecasted 10 years into the future and updated every six months;
  • development and testing of new methods for adult mortality and estimation of levels for each country;
  • assessment of major causes of death for each country every three years;
  • development of cross-country comparable methods for the estimation of healthy life expectancy;
  • estimation of the global burden of disease for 1990 and 2005, in collaboration with the World Health Organization, the University of Queensland, Johns Hopkins University, Harvard University, and over 800 researchers throughout the world. 

Health Services: IHME studies how health systems contribute to improving health outcomes by measuring the delivery of specific interventions and the quality of services. Research in this area currently focuses on two sub-fields:

  • measuring the coverage of the twenty most important health-improving technologies (including personal and non-personal interventions) by country every year.  The selection of priority interventions will vary by region on the basis of epidemiology.
  • estimating the quality of inpatient and outpatient care, including the development and refinement of standardized methods for undertaking risk-adjusted outcomes measurement.

Resource Inputs: In this area we track, measure and estimate inputs to global health, such as money, people, facilities, medications, and technology. IHME currently focuses on four areas:

  • annual assessment from 1990 to 2006 of resource flows for global health, including an estimation of the gap between commitment and disbursement.
  • systematic review of the quality of available data on public expenditures on health.
  • estimation of household expenditure and catastrophic payments.
  • landscape analysis of sources of data and methods for tracking human resource.

Decision Analytics: IHME is creating tools and evidence to help decision-makers weigh different options and make meaningful comparisons. For example, how do we characterize inequalities? How do we predict what might happen in the future? Currently, we are engaged in the:

  • development of statistical models for missing data, internally consistent epidemiological parameter estimation, and forecasting.
  • measurement of within and across country inequalities in coverage, health outcomes, and health expenditures.
  • development and dissemination in collaboration with the Health Metrics network, of methods for local area estimation of health outcomes and coverage.
  • priority setting – major effort to combine burden of disease, intervention coverage, cost-effectiveness, and resource information to identify policy options for interventions and service delivery platforms for different countries and regions.

Evaluations: Our goal is to provide methods, tools and answers to the question: how do we measure the impact of what is being done, whether it is a specific policy, a specific intervention or a health system reform. IHME’s researchers are working to:

  • assess the performance of statistical methods for analyzing program effectiveness in non-randomized settings.
  • develop guidelines for prospective impact evaluation.
  • impact evaluation of global health initiatives and strategies.
  • assess the performance of national health systems for countries with sufficient data.
  • evaluate, based on demand, specific national health system reforms.  

Top of Page